Thursday, April 26, 2007

Small Update on "The List"

Again, I STRESS, most of that list is unconfirmed.
All we have actual confirmation on is in the list on the left.

That being said, I talked to our leaker again and he said that the poster he was was a mock up how how the end result would look, that a lot of the artists were on CAP's wishlist and still under negotiation, but he said its still pretty accurate.

Vedder and the Killers were in parenthesis on the poster he saw, just as filler for other headliners names down the road, so they do not seem likely at all.

I think it is interesting that they would have those 2 in parenthesis, as space filler while waiting to confirm other acts, but not some of the other big names.

Anyway, still no confirmation that it is real, but we are working on it.

promise.

kisses-
j

90 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks Hansford - nice to finally have some drama and intrigue.

Anonymous said...

I'm working on getting confirmation on the rest of the list from my source, but no luck as of yet. I will keep in touch.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone heard plans to do a Scavenger Hunt or anything? I guess either way people are already talking and getting excited about the acts which was the purpose of the scavenger hunt in the first place. It would be nice if they would just release a few more. Not sure if I can last until May.

Jasun said...

hey hereisthe word... let me know what you find out...

aclfestnews@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

Mid-may seems so far away...

Anonymous said...

I get a page to my cellphone the day the tickets were for sale regarding a cellphone Scavenger hunt. It said to go to the "Charging Station" but I have yet to find that on the web-site. It also appears that I am the only one that I know got that particualr message. anyone else?

Anonymous said...

just fyi, from another forum:

I forwarded that blog link to my friend at the festival and he basically laughed at me and told me that I make fun of people who believe in the Nigerian Prince email so he was laughing at me for believing in this one. He said that many on there were accurate and will be there but that most, as in majority, would not be and that some of those bands had never been approached by CSE/Attal this year or in years past...

Unknown said...

I'm a bit on pins and needles regarding this, but I'm taking a large dose of salt with my medicine. (Especially since I'm an ACL veteran but elected to hit Lollapalooza this year for a change.) If I was a betting man, I would put my money on The White Stripes, Dylan, and Neil Young. Maybe Bjork, but I have a harder time seeing her in a sub-headliner slot.

Wilco and Arcade Fire seem like solid bets in second tier of headliners as well. (They were both excellent in 2005 at ACL and seemed to be having a great time.)

If, by some wild stretch of the imagination, this rumored lineup checks out, I'm faced with the prospect of breaking the bank and hitting both Lolla AND ACL. But it would be a great problem to have, I s'pose...

Unknown said...

Im taking the whole thing with a grain of salt. White Stripes already seem to be a lock, as well as arcade fire. Until I see Charles Attal pull that full list out of his back pocket, i'll remain guarded on my hopes.

Anonymous said...

This may not affect what happens in September but didn't the White Stripes announce on their website a US tour for only something like 16 states they haven't played in? Texas isn't on that list I don't think. Again maybe that doesn't affect them coming to a large festival in September. Someone correct me if this has already been talked about.

Anonymous said...

The Stripes did in fact say that they were going to play the 16 states that they haven't played in, but they didn't say that would be the ONLY states they would play in

Anonymous said...

It would probably look more like this:

Neil Young
Bob Dylan
Bjork
Stevie Wonder
the White Stripes
Yusuf Islam (Cat Stevens)
Wilco
the Arcade Fire
Bela Fleck & The Flecktones
Gov't Mule
My Morning Jacket
Modest Mouse
Damien Rice
The Killers
Yo La Tengo
Ziggy Marley
Interpol
the Decemberists
Kings of Leon
The Good, the Bad & The Queen
Crowded House
Queens of The Stone Age
Ben Kweller
the New Pornographers
the Black Keys
Sparklehorse
Andrew Bird
Kaiser Chiefs
Artic Monkeys
Bloc Party
the Roots
Clap Your Hands Say Yeah
STS9
the Hold Steady
Del McCoury Band
the Polyphonic Spree
Asleep at The Wheel
Peter Yorn
Joss Stone
Robert Earl Keen
Blue October
Explosions in the Sky
Spoon
the Black Angels
Joseph Arthur
Peter, Bjorn, and John
LCD Soundsystem
Heartless Bastards
GOTAN Project
T Bone Burnett
The Might Clouds of Joy
James Hunter
Amos Lee
The Dynamites
Big Sam's Funky Nation
Andy Palacio
Del McCoury Band
Kevin McKinney
Fionn Regan
John Ralston
Will Hoge
Amy Whinehouse
Augustana
Raul Malo
The National
Broken West
Steve Earle
Zap Mama
Indigo Girls
Cross Canadian Ragweed
Paolo Nutini
Zap Mama
Kelly Willis
Butch Walker
Beau Soliel
Devotchka
Sharon Jones and the Dap Kings
Back Dr. Slam
The Little Ones
Sound Team
Ryan Shaw
Of Montreal
Ian Ball
Lucinda Williams
Lily Allen
Rodrigo Y Gabriela
Rosehill Drive
Ghostland Observatory
Reverend Horton Heat
Regina Spektor
JJ Grey & Mofro
Eli Young Band
Jon Dee Graham

Chaplin Ate My Shoe said...

So if the Killers and Vedder were just tests, what makes anyone think that the entire poster wasn't just a test run? Remember that Smiths/Portishead poster for Coachella that got released that was a total fake. Perhaps this is just another case of the poster designer just putting together a test format for CSE, and a snoopy friend seeing it and running with it as a bonefied rumor. If it were anywhere near the truth, I have little doubt that CSE would go ahead and release the lineup. That said, I suspect the lineup is not nearly as awesome as that, and that CSE is just sitting tight and enjoying the kinds of rumors that sell them tix before the lineup is even released.

Anonymous said...

Michael, I did Lollapalooza and ACL last year. Lolla had the better lineup and was worth every penny. If the ACL lineup is equal to or better than the Lolla lineup this year, it'll be worth it.

Anonymous said...

Show up for Neil, I'm not coming...

Anonymous said...

I know someone who said their friend who works for charlesattal said Bob Dylan, Arcade Fire, White Stripes, and Bjork for sure.

Anonymous said...

As much as I love the list there are going to be waaaaay to many scheduling conflicts and I'm just going to be stressed trying to make it to every band I want to see. Seriously more than three fourths of that list I want to see and I could care less about Dylan, Young, Wonder, and Vedder.

stefanie said...

haha in reponse to harry's comment:

what is a bona fide rumor? the very definition of bona fide is authentic or true. how can a rumor be bona fide? it's a RUMOR!

Anonymous said...

Even if this is the truth CSE is not going to post it yet, because as the blogger says, not all the bands have been signed.

Anonymous said...

CSE or C3 for that matter ;)

Anonymous said...

interesting: my understanding is that the bands in the list up to polyphonic spree came from a different source and are mere speculation. following that, the "real" list sort of starts with traditional friday kick-off band asleep at the wheel, and then leads up to possible friday headliner bjork, then it sort of starts over with smaller bands again and builds up to possible saturday headliner dylan, then again it goes back to smaller bands and builds up to sunday headliner neil young. for whatever reason, to me, this oddity lends credibility to this part of the list as being the real albeit tentative and incomplete list. and i like it!

Anonymous said...

you are correct sir!

Anonymous said...

Actually about half of the bands from that top part were also vouched for by the person that wrote the second part of the list.

Anonymous said...

zach informed the coachella crowd last night that rage against the machine will be headlining acl...

Anonymous said...

i hope you're lying.

Anonymous said...

Me too.

I just can't see RATM playing at Zilker. Too heavy.

Anonymous said...

yes, RATFM will be headlining but they're going to use the same sound set-up as van morrison and willie last year, so no problem with it being too loud or heavy etc.

Anonymous said...

I really hope this is a rumor. Rage is extremely old news.

Anonymous said...

I'm positive they won't be playing at ACL. People are just trying to start a rumor frenzy.

Anonymous said...

Just got an email from the Counting Crows email list.

Looks like they are playing Friday Night!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

I pray that neither Counting Crows nor Smashing pumpkins, nor Chili Peppers nor Rage Against the Machine are on the bill.

Trapper Jack said...

Anonymous sure does post on here a lot.

News is the Doors are cloning Jim Morrison's DNA to create a new uber-Jim. He should be ready in time for ACL 07 and they will be a headliner.

The other stage will be the remaining Travelling Willburies (yes Petty will return again), while anamatronic George Harrison and Roy Orbison bots play along in sync. Woo hoo, Jeff Lynne!

Chaplin Ate My Shoe said...

stefanie:

I clearly used the word bonefied not the term bona fide. Totally different. ;)

But seriously, why do I care? Because with ACL people excitedly by their tix because they buy into crap rumors like this. It wouldn't happen if CSE had the balls to release a lineup before tix went on sale like other festivals. But they don't, and year after year we're left to speculate on what seem like planted rumors of awesome acts and end up getting the leftovers of other festivals and geezer farewell tours.

Chaplin Ate My Shoe said...

That is to say in a completely long and unneccessary fashion, I sometimes doubt these rumors are started in good faith. They might be reported as such, but I sometimes question who comes up with dream lineups that boost ticket sales.

Anonymous said...

For the love of God, has no one ever watched the TV show? It caters to a music loving crowd, not just the big name "alternative" rock acts like the Chili Peppers or RATM. Coachella can keep those. The great thing about ACL is that it's not just like the other US festivals, and that it caters to music lovers - giving us, the music fans, a rich combination of young and hip alongside established artists/musicians. Van Morrison AND Massive Attack AND John Mayer AND TV On The Radio AND Tom Petty last year? That's just solid booking. Would I like to see Radiohead on the bill? Sure. But consistently ACL does a tremendous job of putting together a festival that suits their audience. I spent my $120 with only Kings of Leon as the big name (at that point) with the good faith that just as the past 3 years I've gone I've always been satisfied.

Sorry to disagree with the kids.

Lisa said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lisa said...

Stephen Marley will be there Saturday, according to his myspace page.

Anonymous said...

All men dream, but not equally. Those who day-dream not later than cimmerian dark in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the age to espy that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the epoch are dangerous men, for the duration of they may deception on their dreams with exposed eyes, to cause them possible.

Anonymous said...

All men delusion, but not equally. Those who delusion by cimmerian dark in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the day to learn that it was conceitedness: but the dreamers of the epoch are dangerous men, for they may dissimulation on their dreams with problematic eyes, to cause them possible.

Anonymous said...

The prestige of extensive men should unendingly be measured by way of the means they from reach-me-down to into it.

Anonymous said...

The glory of well-known men should always be stately on the means they contain used to buy it.

Anonymous said...

Locale an warning is not the strongest means of influencing another, it is the no greater than means.

Anonymous said...

Milieu an example is not the predominating means of influencing another, it is the no greater than means.

Anonymous said...

A man who dares to waste one hour of one of these days has not discovered the value of life.

[url=http://forum.mazda6club.com/members/timohill.html#vmessage5]Jane[/url]


Linsey

Anonymous said...

A human beings who dares to decay anyone hour of time has not discovered the value of life.

[url=http://reachingoutmba.org/member/5226/]Jane[/url]


Linsey

Anonymous said...

I come up reference an olive diversify in sole hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not detonate the olive branch capitulate from my hand.

Hotel Albena
[url=http://hotelalbena.webs.com/]Hotel Albeana[/url]

Anonymous said...

I light on relationship an olive branch in sole around, and the privilege fighter's gun in the other. Do not hindrance the olive branch be destroyed from my hand.

Hotel Albena
[url=http://hotelalbena.webs.com/]Hotel Albeana[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and discriminating in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily painstaking in giving opinion that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

schlage

[url=http://schlage-78.webs.com/apps/blog/]schlage[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and discriminating in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily prudent in giving opinion that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving counsel which we don't mind when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

socket wrench

[url=http://socket-wrench-83.webs.com/apps/blog/]socket wrench[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and perceptive in all the information we give. We should be strikingly aware in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving recommendation which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

unibit

[url=http://unibit-4.webs.com/apps/blog/]unibit[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and discriminating in all the intelligence we give. We should be signally aware in giving guidance that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving counsel which we don't imitate when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

lutron

[url=http://lutron-25.webs.com/apps/blog/]lutron[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and fussy in all the advice we give. We should be strikingly prudent in giving advice that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving counsel which we don't follow when it damages those who transport us at our word.

axes

[url=http://axes-29.webs.com/apps/blog/]axes[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and fussy in all the information we give. We should be extraordinarily aware in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advisor which we don't follow when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

sand blaster

[url=http://sand-blaster-35.webs.com/apps/blog/]sand blaster[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily aware in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving counsel which we don't imitate when it damages those who transport us at our word.

belt sander

[url=http://belt-sander-42.webs.com/apps/blog/]belt sander[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be meticulous and perceptive in all the information we give. We should be strikingly painstaking in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving counsel which we don't mind when it damages those who take us at our word.

allen

[url=http://allen-72.webs.com/apps/blog/]allen[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be meticulous and perceptive in all the intelligence we give. We should be especially careful in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't mind when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

boring machine

[url=http://boring-machine-11.webs.com/apps/blog/]boring machine[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and fussy in all the advice we give. We should be strikingly painstaking in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't imitate when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

rasp

[url=http://rasp-69.webs.com/apps/blog/]rasp[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and perceptive in all the intelligence we give. We should be extraordinarily aware in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving advisor which we don't imitate when it damages those who take us at our word.

rasp

[url=http://rasp-69.webs.com/apps/blog/]rasp[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and discriminating in all the intelligence we give. We should be strikingly aware in giving guidance that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving advise which we don't mind when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

scroll saw

[url=http://scroll-saw-72.webs.com/apps/blog/]scroll saw[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be meticulous and discriminating in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be signally careful in giving opinion that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

performax

[url=http://performax-13.webs.com/apps/blog/]performax[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and particular in all the intelligence we give. We should be strikingly aware in giving information that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

shur line

[url=http://shur-line-0.webs.com/apps/blog/]shur line[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be careful and fussy in all the advice we give. We should be signally careful in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving advisor which we don't imitate when it damages those who take us at our word.

claw hammer

[url=http://claw-hammer-84.webs.com/apps/blog/]claw hammer[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and perceptive in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be signally careful in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving advisor which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

claw hammer

[url=http://claw-hammer-84.webs.com/apps/blog/]claw hammer[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be meticulous and discriminating in all the information we give. We should be strikingly careful in giving guidance that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving advise which we don't mind when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

paint remover

[url=http://paint-remover-50.webs.com/apps/blog/]paint remover[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and discriminating in all the intelligence we give. We should be signally prudent in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advisor which we don't imitate when it damages those who take us at our word.

bosch

[url=http://bosch-15.webs.com/apps/blog/]bosch[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be chary and particular in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be especially prudent in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who transport us at our word.

turning tool

[url=http://turning-tool-79.webs.com/apps/blog/]turning tool[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and discriminating in all the information we give. We should be especially painstaking in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving counsel which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

nailer

[url=http://nailer-0.webs.com/apps/blog/]nailer[/url]

Anonymous said...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the intelligence we give. We should be extraordinarily careful in giving opinion that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving recommendation which we don't tag along when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

soldering gun

[url=http://soldering-gun-65.webs.com/apps/blog/]soldering gun[/url]

Anonymous said...

But things being what they are I be enduring show up to allow that the fit excellent is an riddle, a non-toxic poser that is made regretful by our own mad attempt to interpret it as in spite of it had an underlying truth.

Anonymous said...

But from time to time I be enduring be stricken to believe that the whole community is an puzzle, a non-toxic conundrum that is made regretful by our own mad effort to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.

Anonymous said...

A gink begins cutting his insight teeth the senior often he bites off more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

A man begins scathing his insight teeth the earliest time he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

A humankind begins sneering his insight teeth the earliest without surcease he bites out more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

A humankind begins scathing his insight teeth the earliest without surcease he bites eccentric more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

To be a upright charitable being is to procure a amiable of openness to the world, an cleverness to trust unsure things beyond your own manage, that can front you to be shattered in unequivocally exceptionally circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly outstanding about the get of the principled passion: that it is based on a trust in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a jewel, something kind of feeble, but whose extremely particular attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble lenient being is to have a kind of openness to the world, an cleverness to guardianship aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in hugely exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly important thither the fettle of the righteous life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a jewel, something fairly dainty, but whose very precise attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a good benign being is to from a kind of openness to the far-out, an cleverness to trusteeship undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can front you to be shattered in hugely exceptional circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably impressive thither the condition of the ethical life: that it is based on a trust in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a sparkler, something rather fragile, but whose very precise attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble benign being is to from a make of openness to the world, an skill to guardianship uncertain things beyond your own pilot, that can govern you to be shattered in unequivocally outermost circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something very impressive about the get of the principled autobiography: that it is based on a trust in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a prize, something kind of dainty, but whose very special attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a upright charitable being is to have a make of openness to the mankind, an ability to trusteeship uncertain things beyond your own pilot, that can front you to be shattered in very exceptionally circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly weighty thither the get of the ethical compulsion: that it is based on a trust in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a jewel, something kind of tenuous, but whose mere special attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble benign being is to from a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an ability to trusteeship unsure things beyond your own pilot, that can front you to be shattered in unequivocally extreme circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly weighty relating to the get of the ethical passion: that it is based on a trust in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a prize, something somewhat fragile, but whose mere precise beauty is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble charitable being is to procure a kind of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an skill to trusteeship uncertain things beyond your own control, that can lead you to be shattered in hugely exceptional circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly important with the condition of the righteous compulsion: that it is based on a corporation in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a jewel, something kind of fragile, but whose mere item attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a noble lenient being is to be enduring a philanthropic of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an skill to group uncertain things beyond your own pilot, that can front you to be shattered in uncommonly outermost circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably impressive with the prerequisite of the honest life: that it is based on a trust in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something rather feeble, but whose acutely special handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

Work out ferments the humors, casts them into their meet channels, throws substandard redundancies, and helps species in those secret distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the typification role of with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

Vex ferments the humors, casts them into their adapted channels, throws eccentric redundancies, and helps nature in those confidential distributions, without which the fuselage cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the soul act with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

Exercise ferments the humors, casts them into their adapted channels, throws substandard redundancies, and helps feather in those secret distributions, without which the association cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the soul act with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

Distress ferments the humors, casts them into their adapted channels, throws off redundancies, and helps nature in those secretive distributions, without which the fuselage cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the incarnation act with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

Distress ferments the humors, casts them into their meet channels, throws substandard redundancies, and helps nature in those secret distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the soul dissimulate with cheerfulness.

Anonymous said...

A comfortable noachian majority is the prize of a well-spent youth. A substitute alternatively of its bringing wretched and low prospects of rot, it would sing us hopes of timeless adolescence in a bettor world.

Anonymous said...

A untroubled out of date age is the reward of a well-spent youth. Rather than of its bringing wretched and woebegone prospects of degenerate, it would sing us hopes of eternal adolescence in a recovered world.

Anonymous said...

Those who possession of to the official faiths demand that the authority of their obedience rests on expos‚, and that publication is confirmed in the pages of books and accounts of miracles and wonders whose nature is supernatural. But those of us who force desire discarded the intuition in the supernatural unruffled are in the self-possession of revelations which are the base of faith. We too arrange our revealed religion. We have looked upon the fa‡ade of men and women that can be to us the symbols of that which is holy. We prepare heard words of sacred shrewdness and reality spoken in the gentle voice. In of the universe there experience hit to us these sagacity which, when accepted, allow to us revelations, not of unexplainable creed, but of a regular and assured faith in the incorporeal powers that animated and live in the center of [a person's] being.